|
World Population Prospects,
the 2010 Revision |
|
Frequently Asked
Questions
(Updated: 31 October 2011)
|
Link: Print Version |
|
1. What is the most recent Revision of World Population Prospects? |
|
2. When will the next Revision of the World Population Prospects be released?
|
|
3. When has the world population reached or is expected to reach each successive billion?
|
|
4. How do we know that the world population reaches 7 billion on 31 October 2011?
|
|
5. What data have been published from the 2010 Revision of the World Population Prospects?
|
|
6. Is the 2010 Revision using a target value of 2.1 children per woman for projecting fertility?
|
|
7. Are all countries projected to reach a total fertility of 2.1 children per woman in 2100?
|
|
8. Does the 2010 Revision project the
decline of fertility to stop at 1.85 children per woman?
|
|
9. Why does the 2010 Revision assume a slight fertility increase for countries with below-replacement fertility?
|
|
10. What are the main differences between the 2008 and the 2010 Revisions of the World Population Prospects?
|
|
11. What is the estimation period for the 2010 Revision of the World Population Prospects?
|
|
12. What is the projection period for the 2010 Revision of the World Population Prospects?
|
|
13. Which empirical data have been used to prepare total population estimates?
|
|
14. Why are successive Revisions of the World Population Prospects issued every two years?
|
|
15. What country aggregates are available for the World Population Prospects?
|
|
16. Where can I find population estimates for periods before 1950?
|
|
17. Why does the Population Division produce estimates instead of using official national data?
|
|
18. Why do estimates in the World Population Prospects sometimes differ from official statistics?
|
|
19. Why is only one variant of future mortality used in producing the projections?
|
|
20. Who is using the results of the World Population Prospects?
|
|
21. Why will volumes 1 and 2 of the World Population Prospects no longer be available in print?
|
|
22. Which data sources have been used for estimating mortality in the World Population Prospects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. What is the most recent Revision of World Population
Prospects? |
|
|
The 2010 Revision is the most recent revision of World
Population Prospects, the official United Nations population
estimates and projections. It was released on 3 May 2011. |
|
|
|
|
2.
When will the next Revision of the World Population
Prospects be released? |
|
|
The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social
Affairs of the United Nations issues a new Revision every two
years. The next one is due in the first half of 2013. |
|
|
|
|
3.
When has the world population reached or is expected to reach each
successive billion? |
|
|
3
Billion: 20 October 1959
4
Billion: 27 June 1974
5
Billion: 21 January 1987
6
Billion: 5 December 1998
7
Billion: 31 October 2011
8
Billion: 15 June 2025
9
Billion: 18 February 2043
10
Billion: 18 June 2083
These dates are derived from the annual series of world population
estimates obtained by interpolating the results of the 2010
Revision of World Population Prospects by assuming
exponential growth within each year. Because the estimated dates
depend on the population estimates and projections used to derive
them and those estimates and projections change from one Revision
to another, they constitute the best approximations at any given
time. |
|
|
|
|
4. How do we know that the world
population reaches 7 billion on 31 October 2011? |
|
|
We don’t know that the world population
will reach exactly 7 billion on 31 October 2011. No one can
know this.
The 31st October is a
symbolic date, which is based on interpolated data from the
original 5-year period estimates prepared by the Population
Division. These population estimates, which are published every
second year as part of the World Population Prospects, are
based on the most recently available censuses, surveys, vital and
population registers, and other data sources. The Population
Division is preparing such estimates since the early 1950s. They
have been recognized as the “gold standard” of population
estimates and projections for all countries of the world. The
estimates
for each country are always prepared separately. Only once these
data are uploaded into a database, projected, aggregated and
interpolated is it possible to calculate the date when the world
population reaches a certain number of people.
The reason, for the high uncertainty in
this date is the fact that statistical data are not perfect. Even
the best censuses in the world have enumeration errors in the range
of at least 1 to 2 percent. If we assume an enumeration error of 2
percent for the census of China, India and Indonesia, the world
population could be 56 million larger or smaller. Of course, the
Population Division tries to compensate these errors by using
information from post-enumeration surveys and other sources if
available. It is also likely that overestimation in some countries
is partially compensated by underestimation in other countries. Yet,
it is very likely that we have uncertainty in total population
estimates of at least 1 percent at the global level.
If we assume an error margin of only
1 percent at the global level the 7 billion world population could
be reached 6 months earlier or later (in 20 March 2011 or 12 April
2012 as compared to our calculated date of 31 October 2011).
In other words, no one can
determine the exact date of a 7 billion world population with an
error margin smaller than about 12 months because of the inevitable
inaccuracies in all demographic statistics – including even the most
professional censuses. In fact, due to very poor demographic
statistics in a significant number of developing countries the
uncertainty may be even larger. |
|
|
|
|
5. What data have been published
from the 2010 Revision of the World Population Prospects? |
|
|
The results of the 2010 Revision of the World Population Prospects
are available at different levels of detail, for various kind of
aggregations and in several electronic formats. The table below
provides an overview:
| |
Name |
Location |
Level of
detail |
Format |
|
1. |
On-line Database |
Web Site
(Free) |
Selected results available in 5-year age groups and five
year estimation and projection intervals; only the four
standard variants (medium, high, low, constant
fertility); only 5 countries at a time |
Web site
tables and comma-separated files (csv-files) |
|
2. |
Tables in
EXCEL-Format |
Web Site
(Free) |
Selected results
for all countries and major regions; only in
5-year age groups and five year estimation and
projection intervals; only the four standard variants
(medium, high, low, constant fertility) |
Files in
EXCEL format |
|
3. |
Key
Indicators: Tables |
Web Site
(Free) |
Selected demographic indicators for all countries of
the world with a population of more than 100,000
inhabitants - available in tables that can be sorted by
clicking on the column-header |
html-
tables |
|
4. |
Figures
/ Maps |
Web Site
(Free) |
Selected demographic indicators - available in figures
that can be retrieved for one period and all countries
of the world with a population of more than 100,000
inhabitants or for 5 countries and all periods
(1950-2100). |
gif-Format |
|
5. |
Comprehensive Dataset |
CD-ROM
|
All
available data by 5-year period:
Main results for all countries and major regions; in
5-year age groups and five year estimation and
projection intervals. In addition: all eight projection variants, including estimates
and projections for AIDS countries; annually
interpolated total population; fertility and mortality
data by age and sex.
See detailed description |
Files in
EXCEL format |
|
6. |
Extended
Dataset |
DVD |
All
available data including annually interpolated data:
Detailed results for all countries and major
regions; all data in 5-year age groups and five year
estimation and projection intervals, most demographic
indicators annually interpolated; all variants,
including estimates and projections for AIDS countries;
annually interpolated total population and annually
interpolated population by single years of age and sex
("double interpolation").
See detailed description |
Files in
EXCEL format and in ASCII format for database input |
|
7. |
Special
Aggregates |
DVD |
Medium:
All major demographic indicators - aggregated for a
large number of special country groupings, such as World
Bank income groups. For details see the description of
Special Aggregates. |
Files in
EXCEL format |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Is
the 2010 Revision using a target value of 2.1 children per
woman for projecting fertility? |
|
|
Fertility projection in the 2010
Revision is based on two probabilistic models. Only one
of these models is using the fertility level of 2.1 children per
women as an asymptote.
1. The
first model is a Bayesian Hierarchical Model that is used for
countries with high and medium fertility in 2005-2010. This model is
not applying any kind of target value or asymptote. It only
uses information about the distributions of the rates of decline
from all countries of the world that have already experienced
fertility declines. This model is projecting fertility declines for
the high and medium fertility countries which reach their lowest
levels often far below 2.1 children per women at some time in
the future. Only after these countries have reached their lowest
fertility level, the second model is applied.
2. The
second model is a first-order autoregressive time series
model (AR1) which is used for countries that have
already reached a turning point in the rates of the fertility
decline. For these countries the distributions in the rates of
change are calculated from all those low fertility countries that
have already experienced slight increases in fertility.
In the
long-term, the total fertility is assumed to converge toward and
fluctuate around replacement-level fertility of 2.1 children per
woman.
There is no empirical evidence to
suggest that countries would have sub-replacement fertility for
very long periods. We consider it more plausible that low
fertility countries are “stabilized” with a fertility
fluctuating around 2.1 in the long run.
See
assumptions
for further details. |
|
|
|
|
7. Are
all countries projected to reach a total fertility of 2.1 children
per woman in 2100? |
|
|
No. The
fertility projections in the 2010 Revision are not converging
to a total fertility rate of 2.1 children in 2100 for all countries.
The following figure illustrates the relationship between our total
fertility estimates for the 2005-2010 period and our total fertility
projections for the 2095-2100 period:

A. There
are 13 countries with fertility above 2.1 in 2005-2010, which
are projected to have fertility levels still above 2.1 in 2100
(right-upper quadrant).
B. However,
most of the high and medium fertility countries in 2005-2010 are
projected to have declined below a fertility level of 2.1
children per woman in 2100 (right-lower quadrant).
C. Almost
all low fertility countries (below 2.1 children per woman) in
2005-2010 will still have a fertility of below 2.1 children per
woman in 2095-2100 (left-lower quadrant)
D. There
is not a single fertility country with below-replacement fertility in 2005-2010, for which we project
a fertility level of more than 2.1 children per woman in 2095-2100
(left-higher quadrant). |
|
|
|
|
8. Does
the 2010 Revision project the decline of fertility in currently high or medium
fertility countries to stop at 1.85 children per woman? |
|
|
No. This was
done in previous revisions. In the 2010 Revision of the World
Population Prospects we have not set an arbitrary lower bound for
the fertility decline. Instead we follow the results of the Bayesian
Hierarchical Model, which predicts fertility for several high and
medium fertility countries to fall below 1.85 children per
woman - at least temporarily. The following figure illustrates the
relationship between current levels of fertility and the projected
lowest level of total fertility, which can be at different periods
in the future.

A. There
is only one (very high fertility country) country in the world for
which we project the median fertility to not fall below 2.1
children in the projection period between 2010 and 2100 (upper-right
quadrant).
B. In
most countries we project that the fertility will fall below 2.1
children per woman at some time between 2010 and 2100 (lower-right
quadrant). In many countries we project a decline of fertility to
below 1.85 children per woman.
C. For
a significant number of countries we have estimated that the
fertility has already fallen below the reproductive level of 2.1
children per woman in the periods between 1975 and 2010 (lower-left
quadrant).
All these relations refer to the median of 100,000 stochastic
projections of total fertility. |
|
|
|
|
9.
Why does the 2010 Revision assume a slight fertility increase for
countries with below-replacement fertility? |
|
|
Based on the Estimates
of the 2010 Revision there is empirical evidence that at least 21 countries with sub-replacement fertility have
experienced slight increases in total fertility - after they had reached their lowest fertility
level. Some of these countries have now slightly increasing
fertility for several years. It should be noted that countries had been excluded from this
list where total fertility rates have fluctuated without a
clear trend. Only countries are listed that have shown at least
two subsequent data points of (slight) increase in total fertility.
Based on the (positive) rates of change in total fertility from
these countries the time-series model (AR1) for the
below-replacement countries was developed. Below is the list of
these countries, which includes the five-year interval when the lowest level of total fertility was reported:
|
Belgium |
2000-2005 |
Western
Europe |
|
Bulgaria |
2000-2005 |
Eastern
Europe |
|
Channel
Islands |
1985-1990 |
Northern
Europe |
|
Czech
Republic |
2000-2005 |
Eastern
Europe |
|
Denmark |
1985-1990 |
Northern
Europe |
|
Estonia |
2000-2005 |
Northern
Europe |
|
Finland |
1975-1980 |
Northern
Europe |
|
France |
1995-2000 |
Western
Europe |
|
Germany |
1995-2000 |
Western
Europe |
|
Ireland |
1995-2000 |
Northern
Europe |
|
Italy |
2000-2005 |
Southern
Europe |
|
Latvia |
2000-2005 |
Northern
Europe |
|
Luxembourg |
1985-1990 |
Western
Europe |
|
Netherlands |
1985-1990 |
Western
Europe |
|
Norway |
1985-1990 |
Northern
Europe |
|
Russian
Federation |
2000-2005 |
Eastern
Europe |
|
Singapore |
1985-1990 |
South-Eastern Asia |
|
Spain |
2000-2005 |
Southern
Europe |
|
Sweden |
2000-2005 |
Northern
Europe |
|
United
Kingdom |
1980-1985 |
Northern
Europe |
|
United
States of America |
1980-1985 |
Northern
America |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
What are the main differences between the 2008 and the
2010 Revisions of World Population Prospects? |
|
|
The medium variant of the 2010 Revision produces a world
population in 2050 that is 156 million larger than that produced by
the 2008 Revision (9.31 billion vs. 9.15 billion). Most of
that difference can be traced to a higher number of births projected
by the 2010 Revision (147 million more than the 2008
Revision over the period 2010-2050) and fewer number of deaths
(22 million fewer than the 2008 Revision over the same
period). In addition, the starting population in 2010 is lower in
the 2010 Revision than it was in the 2008 Revision (by
13 million).
The difference in the number of births is mainly attributable to
differences in projected fertility between the two Revisions.
At the world level, total fertility in the 2010 Revision is
slightly lower than in the 2008 Revision at the start of the
projection period (2.45 vs. 2.49 children per woman in 2010-2015)
but after 2020 total fertility is higher in the 2010 Revision
and the difference between the two increases over time so that, by
2045-2050, the 2010 Revision projects a global fertility of
2.17 children per woman whereas the 2008 Revision projects
2.02 children per woman.
These small differences at the world level mask the important
changes made at the country level. Whereas the projection of
fertility in the 2008 Revision was done using four
deterministic models of change which incorporated the strong
assumption that the fertility of all countries would converge toward
1.85 children per woman, the projection of fertility in the 2010
Revision is carried out using two probabilistic models according
to which fertility tends toward 2.1 children per woman in the long
run and the future fertility paths for a given country are generated
taking into account the specific past fertility trends in that
country, those of countries within the same region and the trends in
all countries.
The probabilistic approach permits the simulation of many future
fertility paths for each country (100,000) so that their median can
summarize a central tendency. The median path is used to generate
the medium variant in the 2010 Revision. The results show
that the 2010 Revision produces a more varied distribution of
fertility levels in 2045-2050 than the 2008 Revision did. In
particular, whereas in the 2008 Revision, 93 countries had a
fertility of 1.85 children per woman in 2045-2050 and 111 countries
had a total fertility ranging from 1.85 to 2.1 children per woman,
in the 2010 Revision, just 51 countries have a total
fertility in 2045-2050 within that range. In addition, whereas in
the 2008 Revision just 32 countries had fertility below 1.85
children per woman and 18 had fertility above 2.5 children per
woman, in the 2010 Revision the equivalent numbers are 86 and
39. That is, the 2010 Revision keeps more countries at both
at the low and high ends of the fertility spectrum than the 2008
Revision did. |
|
|
|
|
11.
What is the estimation period for the 2010 Revision of the
World Population Prospects? |
|
|
The 2010 Revision provides population estimates for the
period 1950-2010. Estimates of stocks are presented for every year
that is a multiple of five from 1950 to 2100. Estimates of the
components of population change are presented for five-year periods,
starting with 1950-1955 and ending with 2095-2100. Stock estimates
refer to 1 July of the year in question. Period estimates may be
assumed to refer to the mid-point of the period concerned (e.g. the
mid-point of the period 1 July 1970 to 1 July 1975 is the 1
January 1973). Data presented by single calendar years or single
groups of age are derived by interpolation. |
|
|
|
|
12. What is the projection period for the 2010 Revision
of the
World Population Prospects? |
|
|
The 2010 Revision provides population projections for the period
2010-2100. There is only one series for the population
estimates, but there are several series for the population
projections, because different projection variants are calculated.
Calculations are carried out by five-year periods using data
classified by five-year age group. |
|
|
|
|
13. Which empirical data
have been used to prepare total population estimates? |
|
|
For each revision of the World Population Prospects the Population
Division is collecting, reviewing and, if necessary, adjusting
population statistics from many different sources. The table below
reports the latest data sources that were used to estimate total
population.
|
|
Source of latest total population data |
|
|
Source of latest total population data |
|
|
Number of countries or areas |
|
|
|
Total population in mid-2010 in million |
|
Year |
Census |
Official Estimates |
Other |
Total |
|
Year |
Census |
Official Estimates |
Other |
Total |
|
<1980 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
<1980 |
29.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
|
1980-1989 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
1980-1989 |
230.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
230.0 |
|
1990-1999 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
1990-1999 |
222.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
222.1 |
|
2000 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
2000 |
360.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
360.0 |
|
2001 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
|
2001 |
490.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
490.0 |
|
2002 |
15 |
1 |
0 |
16 |
|
2002 |
210.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
210.0 |
|
2003 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
2003 |
22.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
22.0 |
|
2004 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
|
2004 |
18.0 |
0.1 |
15.0 |
33.1 |
|
2005 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
18 |
|
2005 |
280.0 |
27.0 |
18.0 |
325.0 |
|
2006 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
|
2006 |
180.0 |
25.0 |
0.0 |
205.0 |
|
2007 |
11 |
5 |
0 |
16 |
|
2007 |
210.0 |
210.0 |
0.0 |
420.0 |
|
2008 |
9 |
23 |
0 |
32 |
|
2008 |
1,600.0 |
1,500.0 |
0.0 |
3,100.0 |
|
2009 |
6 |
37 |
0 |
43 |
|
2009 |
30.0 |
390.0 |
0.0 |
420.0 |
|
2010 |
9 |
6 |
0 |
15 |
|
2010 |
130.0 |
170.0 |
0.0 |
300.0 |
|
2011 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
2011 |
6.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6.2 |
|
Total |
141 |
84 |
5 |
230 |
|
Total |
4,018.0 |
2,322.1 |
33.0 |
6,373.1 |
|
Distribution |
61% |
37% |
2% |
100% |
|
Distribution |
63% |
36% |
1% |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 census round |
60 |
82 |
3 |
145 |
|
2010 census round |
2436.2 |
2322 |
18 |
4776.2 |
|
% since 2005 |
26% |
36% |
1% |
63% |
|
% since 2005 |
38% |
36% |
0% |
75% |
Source:
Meta-information from United Nations, Department of Economic and
Social Affairs, Population Division (2011). World Population
Prospects: The 2010 Revision. CD-ROM Edition - Extended Dataset in
Excel and ASCII formats (United Nations publication, ST/ESA/SER.A/306).
For details see also:
Meta-Information on CD-ROM
For the estimation of fertility, mortality and migration many
additional data sources, such as surveys are used in the World
Population Prospects. For details see:
DataSources |
|
|
|
|
14.
Why are successive Revisions of World Population Prospects
issued every two years? |
|
|
Governments have instructed the Population Division to follow a
biennial cycle for the preparation of population estimates and
projections. All Revisions of World Population Prospects
provide a historical time series of population indicators starting
in 1950. The 2010 Revision provides projections up to 2100.
Every new Revision takes into account newly released national
data to revise estimates of past trends in fertility, mortality or
international migration and to update population age distributions
on the basis of newly available census data. For more information on
the data used in preparing the 2010 Revision, please refer to
Data Sources. |
|
|
|
|
15.
What country aggregates are available? |
|
|
The 2010 Revision of World Population Prospects
presents aggregated data and indicators for 4 development groups, 6
major areas and 21 geographical regions. In addition, data for
special country groups are available on demand, including for
sub-Saharan Africa, the land-locked developing countries and the
income groups as defined by the World Bank income groups. These full
set of special groups will be included among the data sets available
for purchase on CD-ROM (to be released by August 2011). |
|
|
|
|
16.
Where can I find population estimates for periods before 1950? |
|
|
For a series of world population estimates starting in year zero,
please refer to Table 1: World Population From Year 0 to
Stabilization in
The World at Six
Billion, United Nations, 1999, p. 5.
For a review of world population estimates prior to 1950 prepared by
the United Nations see: John C. Caldwell and Thomas Schindlmayr
(2002).
Historical
Population Estimates: Unraveling the Consensus,
Population and Development Review, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Jun., 2002),
pp. 183-204. |
|
|
|
|
17.
Why does the Population Division produce estimates of past
population trends instead of using official national data? |
|
|
World Population Prospects
presents estimates for 230 countries and areas. About half of those
countries or areas do not report official demographic statistics
with the detail necessary for the preparation of cohort-component
population projections. The Population Division undertakes its
estimation work in order to close those gaps. The availability of
data gathered by major survey programmes, such as the Demographic
and Health Surveys or the Multiple-Indicator Cluster Surveys, are
useful in generating some of the data that is not currently being
produced by official statistics. |
|
|
|
|
18.
Why do the estimates in World Population Prospects sometimes
differ from official statistics? |
|
|
Official statistics are not perfect. All data have deficiencies.
Official demographic statistics are affected by incompleteness of
coverage, lack of timeliness and errors in the reporting or coding
of the basic information. The analysis carried out by the Population
Division takes into account those deficiencies and seeks to
establish past population trends by resolving the inconsistencies
affecting the basic data. Use of the cohort-component method to
reconstruct populations is the major tool to ensure that the
population trends estimated by the Population Division are
internally consistent.
National Statistical Offices are well aware of the inconsistencies
among data generated by different sources. Even in countries with
advanced statistical systems, it is common for official statistical
series to be revised retrospectively as new data become available
and inconsistencies are corrected. |
|
|
|
|
19.
Why is only one variant of future mortality used in producing the
United Nations projections? |
|
|
Over the medium-term future, changes in fertility are more likely to
have sizable impacts on future population size, growth and age
structure than changes in mortality. Furthermore, whereas there is
universal agreement that reducing mortality is a worthy goal, there
are varied perspectives on what are the fertility trends best suited
to satisfy the goals of different societies. Hence, there is more
demand for exploring the effects of different trends in future
fertility than there is for exploring those of possible future
variations in mortality. |
|
|
|
|
20.
Who is using the results of World Population Prospects? |
|
|
The users of World Population Prospects are many and varied.
All entities of the United Nations system use the Population
Division’s population estimates for the calculation of indicators
that require population as an input. The Division’s population
projections are also used in projecting other population-related
variables or in modeling complex systems that use population is an
exogenous variable. In addition, several entities and organizations
of the United Nations distribute the results of World Population
Prospects through their own databases and websites (e.g., the World
Bank, the Statistics Division/DESA, the Food and Agriculture
Organization). In addition, the data are used by many groups
belonging to civil society, from school-children learning about
population to journalists to academics. Being the official United
Nations population estimates and projections, the results of
World Population Prospects are considered to embody the
authoritative view of population levels, trends and characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
21.
Why will volumes 1 and 2 of World Population Prospects no
longer be available in print? |
|
|
In an effort to "go green" and reduce costs, the United Nations
Population Division will issue the two volumes summarizing the
results of the 2010 Revision of World Population Prospects
only in pdf format so that they can be downloaded via the internet.
Volume 1 will contain the set of Comprehensive Tables showing the
values of each demographic indicator over time and for all major
areas, regions and countries. Volume 2 will contain Country Profiles
displaying time series of relevant demographic indicators for each
of the major areas, regional groups and countries at a time. A
volume containing printouts of the sex and age distributions of
populations will no longer be produced. The data by age and sex will
be available only on Excel spreadsheets or through the interactive
database accessible via the internet. The two volumes are expected
to be released by the third quarter of 2011. |
|
|
|
|
22. Which data sources have been used for estimating mortality in the
World
Population Prospects? |
|
|
The following table gives the number
of countries for which selected types of information are available
for estimating mortality by type of information and period based on
the 2008 Revision of the World Population Prospects.

Data sources as used in the 2008
Revision of the World Population Prospects
Notes: Includes only countries
with a population of 100,000 or more in 2010. For smaller
countries data sources for mortality estimation are even more scarce
or lacking completely.
CEB/CS: Children ever born / children surviving. Refers to countries
that collected summary birth history data in a census or in a survey
that did not include a full birth history.
Source: Tabulation based on the United Nations, Department of
Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2010): World
Mortality Report 2009 (CD-ROM Edition, POP/DB/WMR/Rev.2009/2) |
|
|
|
|
23. Which data sources are used for estimating fertility? |
|
|
The fertility
estimates for the World Population Prospects are based on the
following sources: |
|
|
Vital Registers
Most developed
and some developing countries have vital registration systems, which
record the number of births and the age of the mother. This
information can be combined with estimates of the female population
by age to calculate age-specific fertility rates and total
fertility. Countries either report the (age-specific) rates or the
number of births by age of mother. |
|
|
Surveys
Most developing
countries do not have vital registration systems, or they have only
vital registration in urban areas. In those countries surveys are
typically used to estimate fertility. The surveys are carried out by
various institutions, from National Statistical Offices to
international organizations. The most widely used surveys are the
Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and the Multi-Indicator Cluster
Surveys (MICS). In some countries, there are also Demographic
Surveillance Sites (DSS), which provide in-depth fertility and
health information for particular areas within these countries. Data
from surveys are typically available in the form of birth histories
(either full histories or histories truncated for the last 5 years)
or as the number of "children ever born". Various indirect methods
can be used to analyze and adjust fertility estimates from these
surveys - particularly for historical time periods. |
|
|
Censuses
The third major
source of fertility information are the censuses, which typically
provide information on the number of children ever born, or on the
number of children born during the past 12 or 24 months for each
woman age 15 to 49 enumerated. Census data, which provide full
records for everyone living in a particular household, also allow
application of various indirect measures to estimate fertility, such
as the "own children method", which is based on the children of the
women living in the household. |
|
|
Adjustments
Fertility
information from all data sources, including censuses, may
require adjustments - particularly for historical time series. There
are also various demographic techniques to adjust under-reporting in
particular age-groups. One particular method attempts to reconstruct
the fertility of cohorts across different censuses. For details of
the methods used in the World Population Prospects see the
section on Data Sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
|